The peer review process I: submitting a manuscript
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Submitting a manuscript for peer review--integrity, integrity, integrity.
Publication of a flawed manuscript has significant consequences for the progress of science. When this proves to be intentional, science is brought into disrepute and this puts even more pressure on the shrinking resources that society is prepared to invest in research. All scientific journals, including the Journal of Neurochemistry, have witnessed a marked increase in the number of correction...
متن کاملSubmitting a manuscript.
I feel a little stupid. Recently, I wanted to submit a manuscript to the European Respiratory Journal (ERJ). I went to the ERJ website but, rather bafflingly, did not seem to be able to find a reference as to how one could submit. After Googling I found http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/erj. But there the system immediately defeated me. I had to sign in with a name and password. Not being aware o...
متن کاملToward New Indicators of a Journal’s Manuscript Peer Review Process
Journal impact factor is among the most frequently used bibliometric indicators in scientific-scholarly journal and research assessment. This paper addresses the question as to why this indicator has become so attractive and pervasive. It defends the position that the most effective way to reduce the role of citation-based journal metrics in journal and research assessment is developing indicat...
متن کاملA review of the review process: manuscript peer-review in biomedical research
Editorial peer review has remained the gold standard for evaluation of scientific research for nearly two centuries. Its importance has increased all the more due to the currently prevailing ‘publish or perish’ culture. This article reviews the drawbacks in the current peer-review practices and the suggested methods to overcome such drawbacks. A universally acceptable method of peer-review is y...
متن کاملProposing a manuscript peer-review checklist
BACKGROUND In the Internet-able era, reviewers are faced with an increased number of manuscripts and decreased time to review. In order to maintain the same, if not higher level of quality in the peer-review process, a net gain in productivity is required. Our goal is to present a manuscript peer-review checklist to help reviewers achieve this secondary yet critical task in a more systematic fa...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International Urogynecology Journal
سال: 2011
ISSN: 0937-3462,1433-3023
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-011-1559-0